During this pregnancy, we’ve made some decisions that are probably considered alternative. Alternative can sometimes be a nice word for ‘crazy,’ ‘weird,’ and ‘strange.’ Although I like to think that our alternative decisions are well reasoned, researched, and at least semi-educated, I’m okay with seeming a little weird.
Our alternative decision du jour? Skipping some ultrasounds.
One goal for this pregnancy was to avoid unnecessary medical intervention. In many instances, sonograms could be considered unnecessary. There’s no recommended number of ultrasounds for routine care, but the American Pregnancy Association says the following: “Ultrasounds are only necessary if there is a medical concern. For women with an uncomplicated pregnancy, an ultrasound is not a necessary part of prenatal care.”
According to the Food and Drug Administration, ultrasounds cause physical changes to occur in the body. They note, “laboratory studies have shown that diagnostic levels of ultrasound can produce physical effects in tissue, such as mechanical vibrations and rise in temperature,” in addition to causing the development of small pockets of gas in bodily fluids or tissues, called cavitation. To be fair, ultrasounds have been used for 20+ years, and have an excellent safety record. So, in certain instances, ultrasounds are a great tool. Side note: commercial places that offer ultrasounds for the sole purpose of producing keepsake videos, and ultrasound monitors for home use are definitely frowned upon by all medical organizations. Remember, the technology wasn’t designed for generating scrapbook photos.
Initially, we discussed skipping all ultrasounds. My OBGYN office has its own reputation for being alternative, so they weren’t shocked by our decision. We did spend a lot of time talking things over with the staff, and ultimately decided to skip the early ultrasound, have an anatomy scan at 18 weeks, and then forego all other scans unless there was a serious medical concern that couldn’t be addressed by other means.
Here’s why we skipped the early ultrasound at eight weeks, even though my doctor offered it, and its cost would have been covered entirely by insurance:
- One reason to have an early ultrasound is to pinpoint a due date. I was temping, charting, and using OPKs. I knew the day I’d conceived within a twenty-four hour window – there wasn’t any question about my due date.
- Another reason to have early ultrasound is to rule out multiples. I wasn’t undergoing fertility treatment, and multiples aren’t hereditary in our families.
- Some people have early ultrasounds due to early pregnancy complications, like bleeding and cramping. I wasn’t experiencing any of these side effects, so it wasn’t a concern.
- Early ultrasounds may cause false alarms or reveal complications that don’t have solutions. Anxiety is a part of my daily life, and one way for me to minimize it is to assume that everything is going to be okay – I felt great and had no troubling symptoms, so I think it was a rational assumption. False alarms or situations without solutions would go a long way towards driving me crazy, so personally, it was just better not to know.
- Medical evidence suggests that giving every pregnant woman an ultrasound, compared to selective use of ultrasound based on clinician recommendation, does not reduce fetal disease or death. Basically, the study said that if you don’t have obvious risk factors, there’s no medical benefit to having an ultrasound.
- And finally, we skipped this ultrasound because everything we read concluded with pretty much the same idea: the long-term effects of fetal ultrasound exposure are unknown. There was no obvious medical benefit to have the early scan, so why risk it?
I don’t regret our decision to skip the early ultrasound – it was the right choice for us, and our situation. We did agree to an anatomy scan at 18 weeks – I’m not sure we had great information on the benefits, but our practitioner shared some anecdotal stories about the advantages, and we decided to have it done.
I’m not going to lie – seeing the living thing that’s taken up residence inside my uterus was pretty much the coolest thing ever. Mr. Tricycle was especially enthralled – the seat at the end of the table wasn’t good enough for him – he had to stand up and lean over the ultrasound tech’s shoulder for the best possible view.
Although the anatomy scan was awesome, I’m resigned to the fact that it was the last time we’ll “see” our baby until birth. The scan didn’t detect any complications, so with fingers crossed, we won’t have any reason to have another.
Anyone else making decisions that are slightly on the “alternative” side of things?
apricot / 453 posts
Oy! This post makes me feel guilty/awful for getting the several ultrasounds I received. Some for medical reasons, others not.
Ack! Mother’s guilt!
persimmon / 1453 posts
I’m glad someone else is on the crazy….er….”alternative” train. We’re not getting any ultrasounds done. Sometimes I’m very jealous of the ladies who get to see their babies before birth! But, it’s also pretty exciting to have no idea what baby will look like until the big day.
honeydew / 7504 posts
It wasn’t by choice, but we will only end up having one at 12 weeks (for the sequential screening) and the anatomy scan at 20 weeks. That’s just what my OB’s office does. At first, I was really bummed but I’ve come around to the fact that it’s probably for the best. No need to do unnecessary interventions, especially when we don’t know the full long-term effect.
blogger / pear / 1964 posts
@THEKNEST: You totally shouldn’t feel guilty, especially if they’re ultrasounds your doctor recommended!
It’s not easy to pass up the opportunity for an inside peak at what’s going on — I totally wavier in my decision-making.
clementine / 889 posts
I’m not sure how I feel about this or how my opinion might change for my next child. I had an ultrasound at 11 weeks for the NT scan. I didn’t care about the genetic part of the scan, but I wanted the ultrasound. At my 8 week appointment they could not find the heartbeat. They weren’t worried but I was. I was so anxious that I wasn’t really pregnant or something was wrong, that I didn’t hesitate to agree to the scan. Then we scheduled the anatomy scan at 17 weeks. That would have been it, but when I was 37 weeks they were concerned about the baby’s size and position – it looked like he was breech and really big. He wasn’t breech, but the ultrasound measured him at over 8 pounds at 37 weeks. At 39 I went almost 48 hours with no movement at all, so I had a non-stress test and another ultrasound, and he measured over 9 pounds.
DS was born healthy at a whopping 10 pounds 9 ounces and just barely made it out. I was close to being sent for an emergency C-Section.
Now it seems a little funny to me, since for the actual labor and delivery I wanted no interventions at all. But I was pretty anxious during my pregnancy, the ultrasounds were very reassuring to me. (I was the one who kept taking pregnancy tests each week to make sure I was still pregnant until I finally heard/saw the heartbeat at 11 weeks.) Ultrasounds seem so commonplace and unintrusive (I never had a transvaginal one) that I never gave it a second thought.
kiwi / 553 posts
Kudos to you for making choices that work for you and your family!
I chuckled a bit at one of your reasons for not getting the early ultrasound – no need to check for multiples as you weren’t on fertility drugs and they don’t run in either one of your families – because I was in the same boat and found out on the early ultrasound that I was having twins! I can’t IMAGINE if I hadn’t found out early on and waited until 18 weeks haha.
No offense meant to you but we had no clue that this would happen!
But back to the alternative stuff – MANY people think my desire to birth these babies vaginally and with midwives is “alternative”… I’ve been asked numerous times if I’ve schedule my c-section yet. When I say that I’m not planning to have one, the person is always surprised! I didn’t think I was all that strange for not wanting a major surgery, but apparently a lot of people do think that!
cantaloupe / 6730 posts
I think we only get one ultrasound in Canada (or at least where I live). I think it’s around 18 weeks.
blogger / watermelon / 14218 posts
Props to you and blogging about your “alternative” choices
It’s so interesting to hear about the different decisions people make with their pregnancy. It hadn’t even occurred to me to skip ultrasounds (in fact, especially with this pregnancy I have gotten way more than the standard 2!) and it’s great to hear your perspective on this.
FYI, even though I get several pictures with each ultrasound, even though I’m a scrapbooker, they’ve never gone in a scrapbook.
GOLD / wonderful apricot / 22646 posts
We had our dating u/s at 6 weeks to confirm pregnancy and due date and our anatomy scan at 19 weeks. We don’t plan having another unless we run into any complications in the latter half of the pregnancy.
While it was a THRILL to see baby boy, I don’t see the necessity of ultrasounds in an otherwise healthy pregnancy either.
kiwi / 691 posts
I wish we had skipped at least a few of our early ultrasounds. It seemed like every u/s lead to another! Towards the end I felt like I was going for one every week, and I wasn’t high risk or anything. It didn’t even occur to me to decline, even though I did feel uncomfortable exposing my baby to something I wasn’t sure was really necessary.
GOLD / squash / 13464 posts
If I had my choice I would have preferred to just do two ultrasounds (dating, and anatomy scan). But I was slightly high risk because of a prior miscarriage, and I’ve had a number of complications (cramping, bleeding, a bad bought of the stomach flu, etc). So I’ve had tons of ultrasounds already and I’m only 19 weeks. But I also battle anxiety and for me not knowing is MUCH worse than knowing. So the ultrasounds have been medically necessary and they have been beneficial to my mental state.
pomegranate / 3414 posts
Congrats to you on what is now considered alternative but previously was main stream. My mom didn’t have any ultrasounds but found out at 8m that she was having twins when the doctor suddenly heard two heartbeats (fetal heartbeat was checked using a stethoscope instead of doppler back then and apparently we were really in sync with each other). While we had four with my first pregnancy (dating at 8w, anatomy at 20w, biophysical profile due to not feeling movement at 28w, and position/size at 36w) and will have three with my current pregnancy (dating at 7w, anatomy at 19w and position/size around 36w) I often think that current technology while having its advantages takes some of the mystery out of the experience.
guest
Here (Canada) we only get one or two ultrasounds for an uncomplicated pregnancy. I knew my dates for Wonder Baby so I just got the 18 wk. I think our usage is a lot more strictly monitored too, you definitely couldn’t get one for home use!
admin / wonderful grape / 20724 posts
@Shimmer: I was an identical twin, and my mom didn’t find out until just before she gave birth! Ah, the good ol’ days.
blogger / pear / 1964 posts
Something I didn’t touch on, but a couple of you have mentioned — it’s really kind of scary to call a doctor’s office and tell them you’re going to pass on a test. Even though my practice is really open, I was sweating bullets and REALLY nervous to make the phone call and say, “Hey, I’m officially canceling that early ultrasound appointment.” I guess I didn’t want them to think I was an idiot or an unfit mother? Not sure, exactly, but it was nerve-racking! Luckily, they were cool with it, and it was ultimately no big deal, but I did lose a little sleep over making that phone call.
blogger / wonderful cherry / 21628 posts
I’m ok with seeming a little weird too.
I plan to go to a birth center when I get pregnant. I have no idea how many ultrasounds they’ll offer.
apricot / 453 posts
@mrstricycle – thanks, a person tries to be the best mom possible and make the best decisions but things don’t always go your way. Thanks for sharing your thoughts – it’s always great to see other perspectives but they always make me question my own decisions.
clementine / 889 posts
And now I bothered to google the risks and am freaking out. One article published in 2006 about the possible link to autism from ultrasounds links left-handedness in boys to brain damage! (Unless it is hereditary.)
here in case anyone wants to read it. http://www.midwiferytoday.com/articles/ultrasoundrodgers.asp
GOLD / wonderful olive / 19030 posts
My OB office with a normal, non-complicated pregnancy usually only offers 1, the 20 week anatomy scan. However, when I was there for my 9 week they asked me to get one to see why I was measuring big (ended up being a cyst on my ovary that was making me appear to be further along than i was.) I had another one after a car accident (driver’s side impact) to insure the baby was fine and there was no internal bleeding. Otherwise I should be done with ultrasounds until the baby arrives. Makes me a little sad, but I’m okay with it!
apricot / 426 posts
Hm, well where I live in Canada, there seems to be only one ultra sound that is routinely offered and that’s the 18-20 week anatomy scan. We were only offered a 12 week scan because I am over 35. Under-35’s are not supposed to get it. My doctor wouldn’t even try to listen for the heartbeat at 9 weeks in case he couldn’t find it and then cause undo worry. I think someone with known risks would be offered more scans, but for us, there are not too many chances to see the baby.
guest
I had no ultrasounds. I too was charting and didn’t need to find out a due date. I think ultrasound photos are cute, and it would have been thrilling to see our little one moving about at about 20 weeks, but I still love the fact that we didn’t know who we were having until the baby came out. I too am a little wary of ultrasounds, though I do think that there are situations in which it can be used to save lives!
pomegranate / 3225 posts
EVERYONE I know went to one of those 4D places to find out the sex at 16 weeks. They seriously tried to peer pressure me into it, but it didn’t seem like a good idea to me.
I just had my 20 week anatomy scan today, and that’s the only one I’ll be having. Despite the temptation, as long as nothing is wrong, I can’t imagine exposing my baby to any potential harm just for my own desires.
pineapple / 12053 posts
i had two transvaginal U/S because even though I was charting, then insisted that they date me. i won’t have another until my anatomy scan at 19w and i doubt i’ll have more after that unless there are complications.
it’s good to hear that a lot of people don’t get many ultrasounds because i was feeling weird that i didn’t get any until 19w!
guest
w eplanned to skip all but 20wks too… but then I had some spotting at 13wks and got an u/s over a lunch break… twins. yeah, threw out my ideas of no u/s as I was officially freaked
pear / 1787 posts
I don’t plan on having any ultrasounds either. Thanks for blogging about this.
blogger / pineapple / 12381 posts
@mrstilly: no no no! Please don’t stress yourself out about getting your ultrasounds! There is no credible evidence to say us is harmful to the baby. The noise clearly is annoying to the baby, but so are the dopplers to check the heartbeat.
I don’t think it’s the end of the world to skip an ultrasound and I do plenty of crunchy things in my childrearing, but I do try to go with the evidence base whenever there is one available…
guest
I would skip the 12 week ultrasound in the future, since there were false positives of a genetic disorder that caused us stress. That said, I had tons of ultrasounds due to the fact that I conceived using fertility treatments and had gestational diabetes. With GD, there were many instances where I had to give up my natural preferences for a more medicalized approach, but I got a healthy, happy baby in the end:)
blogger / pear / 1964 posts
@mrstilly: I purposely didn’t link to those studies because there’s all kinds of issues with the study design and the failure to replicate the results in similar attempts. Don’t stress yourself out – ultrasounds aren’t a bad thing – just, as with any other medical procedure, something you only do when there’s a need – in my situation, I just didn’t see a need.
grapefruit / 4291 posts
I’m 26 weeks and providing I don’t have any complications I’m not having any further ultrasounds. As it is I’ve had two, a dating scan at nine weeks and the anatomy scan at 22.
We opted out of the NT scan at twelve weeks (we would’ve have only been doing it see Baby) so my midwife recommended me for a free (and very brief) dating scan (I do have longish cycles so it was kinda justified…).
Over here in NZ all our prenatal care is publicly funded but there is a small charge for some scans depending on the provider who does the scan so I think that deters a lot of women from having too many scans.
GOLD / apricot / 341 posts
Ultrasounds are relatively new procedure and I think one would have to wait until the first generations that have had them come into old age before deciding that they are perfectly safe.
I’ve been pregnant in the US and here in Sweden and basically the whole way of doing things here would be considered extremely alternative by American standards. And yet, Sweden is one of the safest countries in the world to give birth or be born in.
We have a completely midwife-based prenatal care system. During a normal pregnancy, a woman would not once be seen by a doctor (although you have the option if you wish towards the end of the first trimester of your first pregnancy if you have specific questions or concerns). Your first appointment is at around 10 weeks. An early (10-14 wk) NT scan is only done if the mother is past a certain age and requests it. Otherwise a bormal pregnancy has just one standard anatomy/dating scan at 18 wks. Only after that standard scan do they start checking the heartbeat during regular appointments. VBACs are standard procedure. During my entire pregnancy in Sweden, no one has “looked under the hood”. The philosophy is that “healthy women have healthy babies” and that pregnancy shouldn’t be seen as an illness or something really medical.
I see pros and cons with both ways of doing things, but thought it might be interesting to highlight another way of looking at pregnancy, and maybe also show you that your way of doing things isn’t really so alternative at all.
Thanks for a good post!
blogger / pear / 1964 posts
@Mini Piccolini: So interesting! I love hearing how other countries do things. I wonder why there tend to be more interventions in the United States? Is it a medical profession thing or a consumer thing or a combination of both?
grapefruit / 4291 posts
@Mini Piccolini:
Sound’s like the system in Sweden is similar to what we do here in New Zealand where the majority of women are cared for by a midwife and most pregnancies only involve two ultrasounds (although many women opt out of the NT scan). I’m just past 26 weeks and my midwife is also yet to feel the need to look “under the hood” either!
I don’t think any one system is perfect or fail-safe but I think that the model of care we have over here is pretty damn good!
@Mrs. Tricycle:
I thought it might be worth mentioning that there is no litigation in NZ so there isn’t the pressure on OB’s to avoid being sued at all costs! We have a no fault system and if there is some sort of accident or medical misadventure / negligence then it would be covered under our Accident Compensation legislation which is open to all NZ’ers.
coffee bean / 48 posts
I only had one ultrasound as well at 18 weeks. It is standard practice with my OB.
honeydew / 7589 posts
@Mrs. Tricycle: Did you also skip the doppler?
I ask because the doppler works the same way and carries the same risks (in fact some say the effects are stronger because it is a constant for sound rather than the intermittent for picture that is the ultrasound).
guest
I’m coming to the party SO late but just discovered this blog and have been religiously reading back to the as-beginning-as-I-can. I live in South Africa, and here everyone who has medical aid (which is the anyone who can afford it since our govt healthcare system can be troublesome) sees a OBGYN mostly for the entire pregnancy – I’ve never seen a midwife! And u/s are scheduled every 4 weeks from 6 – 32 weeks and then every 2 weeks after that until you deliver – so America isn’t nearly as medicalised as here it seems?
So interesting to read about your decision to skip u/s – something to think about for sure.