One of the first things people want to know, when they find out I’m pregnant with a second child, is how old our first is. She just turned three at the tail end of November, and baby brother is likely arriving in early December, so it’s just over a three-year age difference.
Despite the huge number of people who bugged us about when we were going to have another one, starting as soon as M turned one, most people seem to sagely nod when they hear about our three-year difference, and tell me it’s a great range between ages. While I’ve yet to actually live through it, I can see why it may turn out to be a good split.
While M as a younger toddler didn’t grasp the concept of a new baby and what it’d mean to the family, three-year-old M will happily talk your ear off about how she’s going to comfort baby brother when he cries, get him milk when he’s hungry, share her toys, and rock him to sleep (of course, I am not expecting any of that to actually happen, but one can dream, especially when she tells me she’s going to handle the dirty diapers!).
She’s also old enough that she can be helpful, instead of needing all of our help for herself. She understands (mostly) if I tell her that I can’t pick her up because my big belly is hurting my back; she can help herself to snacks from the fridge; she picks up her toys with some cajoling and she really gets joy out of being a helper. Hopefully that attitude sticks around when we have an infant, because her ability to entertain herself independently, and her willingness to take on small tasks could make our whole expanded household dynamic easier.
She’s also all about using the toilet, which is a relief! I would’ve changed two sets of diapers, but I’m really quite glad I’ll only have one kid’s changes to contend with, come December.
I’m not expecting M to immediately or automatically adjust to being a big sister, just because she’s fiercely protective of her big-girl status, but knowing what I know of her personality and how much she’s grown and changed in the past year, I do think that becoming a big sister at age three will be easier for her than it would’ve been at age two.
On the practical side of things, one unintended but AWESOME side effect of this age range is that, by the time baby brother is heading into childcare, M will be eligible for kindergarten. We can enroll kids in Ontario’s kindergarten system in the year that they turn four, and that’s next year for us — it’s full-day, every day, so we’ll only be paying for one set of childcare fees, not two, which is a major, major load taken off of our finances.
She’s also old enough that, to get baby brother into the already-done nursery, we’re giving her a big girl room which is incredibly exciting, instead of a scary transition/a feeling that something is being taken away from her.
For me, the three-year difference gave my body a good chance to heal from the C-section I had with M, a positive factor in trialling a VBAC had we been able to go that direction. I think it’s also better for a repeat C, too, for what it’s worth. And I’ve had a year-long break from breastfeeding, which is much appreciated.
Our original timing and hopes for a second pregnancy would’ve left us with a smaller age difference between the two, and losing that ideal spacing was one of the things that majorly stressed me out when we experienced our three losses before conceiving this baby. While I’m still sad that we lost those pregnancies, I’ve done a lot of work on looking at the good parts of what we cannot control, and the three-year age difference has a lot of benefits I never really explored until that ‘best’ timing had gone out the window.
If you have more than one child, what are their age differences, and what are the benefits and drawbacks?
cherry / 141 posts
My kids are 3 1/2 years apart and I find it perfect for us. Our second is nearing 1 and they PLAY together. I thought they wouldn’t since everyone said they needed to be closer to each-other’s age. I found this not to be true. Our baby crawls around really fast then looks back at my older child as if to say “chase me” The baby also thinks his big sister is hilarious.
It’s the perfect age gap for us.
cantaloupe / 6791 posts
You know this, but LO1 and LO2 are 20 months apart and LO2 and LO3 will be 21 months apart, which makes the oldest and youngest 3.5 years apart. Even though I’m still pregnant, I’m loving how interested he is in the baby and it’s fun that he understands all of it so much more.
I can’t wait to hear all about baby brother! So excited and happy for you guys
guest
My four are all 2.25 to 2.5 years apart, which has been lovely. Big kids are not babies, can see the baby as someone totally helpless, and have a bit of patience and girt. My babies loved watching and listening to the antics and love of their bigs, which was well received by said bigs. My girls would set up chairs either side of the rock n play to watch the youngest sleep and rock it if he fussed. And my first loves playing with baby in the baby gym, aka baby school. They could work their snuggles in around a nursing or sleeping baby. Each big kid took their turn playing baby too and trying out the baby gear. I once found my five year old napping in a bouncy chair.
cantaloupe / 6086 posts
Mine are almost exactly 3 and it was awesome! My older is a girl which I think helps too. Such a good helper and now that he’s 1.5 they have so much fun together. I wanted a little closer and it is much more common to see 1.5-2yr difference where we live but it worked out perfectly!
apricot / 400 posts
Like you, I had always imagined a smaller age difference between my kids, but the universe had other ideas. My kids are 3.75 years apart and it’s turned out fantastic! My oldest is such a help and doting big sister and her brother adores her. I wasn’t sure what their relationship would be like due to the age difference, but I don’t think I have anything to worry about. Good luck & have fun!
grapefruit / 4085 posts
I knew I wanted a 3 yr gap and that’s what we have and its great! M is independent enough that I can leave her if I need to tend to her brother (8 mo) and she’s helpful – when she wants to be.
Also for me, logistically it’s a lot easier dealing with getting them in and out of the car than if she were younger and taking them out places also seems easier to me since she’s old enough not to run away from me.
wonderful olive / 19353 posts
My kids are 32 months apart and I love the age gap! Initially, I wanted them 2-2.5 years apart, but I’m really happy with almost 3 years apart. My eldest is a boy, and it wasn’t until closer to the end of my pregnancy that he was starting to fully understand the concept of me having a baby/him getting a sibling. He’s also a HUGE momma’s boy so towards the end of my pregnancy, he was also starting to become more independent. therefore, I wasn’t as worried about figuring out how to balance a newborn and an extremely clingy toddler.
From the moment we brought DD home, DS has been in love with his little sister and is extremely caring and doting. Sure, he has his moments and jealousy bouts, but he’s also the apple in her eye. I constantly pray that their current loving relationship continues forever and ever, despite the growing pains later on in life, especially those pesky teenage/adolescent years!
persimmon / 1281 posts
Thank you for writing this (and for all those who commented). We’re on the fence on having a second but if we do go for it, there will be at least a 3 year gap. I’m so happy to hear how it’s worked well for so many of you!!
blogger / kiwi / 675 posts
Our first two are 2 years 8 mo apart and now our baby number three is due in a month and will be 3.5 years younger. After experiencing the first age gap I feel like they will all three be close even though the spacing will be longer this go around. My youngest currently is potty trained and sleeping through the night, I think the three ish year age gap is a good one